<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for KHPR: The Voice of Darkness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.khprvod.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.khprvod.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KHPR 008: Sex Magic, the in&#8217;s and out&#8217;s by Tarex</title>
		<link>http://www.khprvod.org/2010/02/khpr-008-sex-magic-the-ins-and-outs/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khpr.xeper.org/?p=81#comment-546</guid>
		<description>Belief in falsehoods?  What isn&#039;t a falsehood considering the ever changing nature of belief and behavior.  Is it so bad to believe in a falsehood when such allow evolutionary growth?  

Ayn Rand discusses the objective as crucial to grasping reality.  Though in the same breath she relates the reality is fixed.  She also relates sensory reconstruction distorts individual perception of fixed reality. 

I am not so sure fixed reality is so important.

Though a reality be fixed; there are almost infinite ways of working or dealing with such realities. As such, fixed or not; reality is very flexible in how one views subjectively or objectively.

Primarily, when it comes to sex, we just think we know what it is. I am not so sure the sexual reality is locked in to the present day belief.  Truth, much can be accomplished through sex magick or tantra; but what we do know for sure, is that most females have the potential to conceive and born a baby. 

Secondarily, most sexual views are based on subjective feelings and tend to escape into transcendentalism or nebulous theories.  

The paradox of sexual magick and non superstitious sex is complicated.  Sexual magick has been attributed to all kinds of sensations, feelings, and cosmic theory.  Yet, non superstitious sex is less complicated and accepts the moment as the is.  They both portend to be evolutionary rubrics in so far as one must deal with the proverbial human factors frequently found in the background. Chiefly, the so called &quot;fixed reality&quot; may be none or all of the above; and steeped in pretend and falsehood.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belief in falsehoods?  What isn&#8217;t a falsehood considering the ever changing nature of belief and behavior.  Is it so bad to believe in a falsehood when such allow evolutionary growth?  </p>
<p>Ayn Rand discusses the objective as crucial to grasping reality.  Though in the same breath she relates the reality is fixed.  She also relates sensory reconstruction distorts individual perception of fixed reality. </p>
<p>I am not so sure fixed reality is so important.</p>
<p>Though a reality be fixed; there are almost infinite ways of working or dealing with such realities. As such, fixed or not; reality is very flexible in how one views subjectively or objectively.</p>
<p>Primarily, when it comes to sex, we just think we know what it is. I am not so sure the sexual reality is locked in to the present day belief.  Truth, much can be accomplished through sex magick or tantra; but what we do know for sure, is that most females have the potential to conceive and born a baby. </p>
<p>Secondarily, most sexual views are based on subjective feelings and tend to escape into transcendentalism or nebulous theories.  </p>
<p>The paradox of sexual magick and non superstitious sex is complicated.  Sexual magick has been attributed to all kinds of sensations, feelings, and cosmic theory.  Yet, non superstitious sex is less complicated and accepts the moment as the is.  They both portend to be evolutionary rubrics in so far as one must deal with the proverbial human factors frequently found in the background. Chiefly, the so called &#8220;fixed reality&#8221; may be none or all of the above; and steeped in pretend and falsehood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KHPR 003: Dr. Michael Aquino, Founder of the Temple of Set by Ambrosius1111</title>
		<link>http://www.khprvod.org/2009/12/khpr-003-dr-michael-aquino-founder-of-the-temple-of-set/comment-page-1/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambrosius1111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 05:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khpr.xeper.org/?p=19#comment-545</guid>
		<description>Check out Allen Saulnier&#039;s novel, The War in Heaven.  It is the story of Satan being expelled from Heaven from Satan&#039;s point of view. Pazuzu, Lilith also play large roles.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out Allen Saulnier&#8217;s novel, The War in Heaven.  It is the story of Satan being expelled from Heaven from Satan&#8217;s point of view. Pazuzu, Lilith also play large roles. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KHPR 001: So you&#8217;re thinking of joining the Temple of Set? by Eric Kauschen</title>
		<link>http://www.khprvod.org/2009/12/khpr-001-so-youre-thinking-of-joining-the-temple-of-set/comment-page-1/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Kauschen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 03:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khpr.xeper.org/?p=8#comment-543</guid>
		<description>Sorry Ron,

The Crystal Tablet is only available to members of the Temple of Set. If you are interested in joining the cost is far less and you should follow the instruction available on the Temple&#039;s website at xeper.org.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Ron,</p>
<p>The Crystal Tablet is only available to members of the Temple of Set. If you are interested in joining the cost is far less and you should follow the instruction available on the Temple&#8217;s website at xeper.org.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KHPR 001: So you&#8217;re thinking of joining the Temple of Set? by Ron Neal</title>
		<link>http://www.khprvod.org/2009/12/khpr-001-so-youre-thinking-of-joining-the-temple-of-set/comment-page-1/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 02:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khpr.xeper.org/?p=8#comment-542</guid>
		<description>My name is Ron Neal.  I have thought  of joining the Temple of Set.  I would like to get the Tablet of Set and some secrets that only people in the Temple know.  I will also pay up to $200 for this.  Is there anyone out there that can hear me ?  If so email me at rneal444@yahoo:disqus 
.com
Sincerely yours,
William Ronald Neal
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My name is Ron Neal.  I have thought  of joining the Temple of Set.  I would like to get the Tablet of Set and some secrets that only people in the Temple know.  I will also pay up to $200 for this.  Is there anyone out there that can hear me ?  If so email me at rneal444@yahoo:disqus<br />
.com<br />
Sincerely yours,<br />
William Ronald Neal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KHPR 003: Dr. Michael Aquino, Founder of the Temple of Set by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.khprvod.org/2009/12/khpr-003-dr-michael-aquino-founder-of-the-temple-of-set/comment-page-1/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khpr.xeper.org/?p=19#comment-541</guid>
		<description>Fixed in the mix. Yessir. Good work. ;) Last week or so I warned myself away from the ToS because of the controversy of this identity; but hearing the voice of a man usually dispels the demons of public projection... hey, you just reminded me of the Purifier from Riddick - we all began as something else. ;(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed in the mix. Yessir. Good work. <img src='http://www.khprvod.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Last week or so I warned myself away from the ToS because of the controversy of this identity; but hearing the voice of a man usually dispels the demons of public projection&#8230; hey, you just reminded me of the Purifier from Riddick &#8211; we all began as something else. ;(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KHPR 008: Sex Magic, the in&#8217;s and out&#8217;s by Mark Luskin</title>
		<link>http://www.khprvod.org/2010/02/khpr-008-sex-magic-the-ins-and-outs/comment-page-1/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Luskin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khpr.xeper.org/?p=81#comment-539</guid>
		<description>Sadly placebo cures for cancer don&#039;t have that kind of effect. There is a good discussion of this at http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/TreatmentsandSideEffects/TreatmentTypes/placebo-effect  Also I think it is telling that your examples of faith in action both use belief in falsehoods as examples of the power of faith.  Perhaps that is the problem itself, that faith so often means belief in falsehoods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly placebo cures for cancer don&#8217;t have that kind of effect. There is a good discussion of this at http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/TreatmentsandSideEffects/TreatmentTypes/placebo-effect  Also I think it is telling that your examples of faith in action both use belief in falsehoods as examples of the power of faith.  Perhaps that is the problem itself, that faith so often means belief in falsehoods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KHPR 008: Sex Magic, the in&#8217;s and out&#8217;s by Mark Luskin</title>
		<link>http://www.khprvod.org/2010/02/khpr-008-sex-magic-the-ins-and-outs/comment-page-1/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Luskin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khpr.xeper.org/?p=81#comment-538</guid>
		<description>If you are interested in how Dr. Hyatt used the idea of Brain Chance see http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8685900848583329138 in particular his discussion of how the neo-cortex is wired to take in signals form the back-brain but not that well wired to send them.  As far as methods for brain change check into Jeffery M. Schwartz&#039; work particularly his book _The Mind and the Brain_.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are interested in how Dr. Hyatt used the idea of Brain Chance see http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8685900848583329138 in particular his discussion of how the neo-cortex is wired to take in signals form the back-brain but not that well wired to send them.  As far as methods for brain change check into Jeffery M. Schwartz&#8217; work particularly his book _The Mind and the Brain_.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KHPR 008: Sex Magic, the in&#8217;s and out&#8217;s by Mark Luskin</title>
		<link>http://www.khprvod.org/2010/02/khpr-008-sex-magic-the-ins-and-outs/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Luskin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khpr.xeper.org/?p=81#comment-537</guid>
		<description>If you </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free KHPRvod Web App by dee</title>
		<link>http://www.khprvod.org/tweets-archive/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khpr.xeper.org/?page_id=35#comment-536</guid>
		<description>most great-ful,on the other side</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>most great-ful,on the other side</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KHPR 004: Dr. Stephen Flowers on Runa by billjackbaugus</title>
		<link>http://www.khprvod.org/2009/12/khpr-004-dr-stephen-flowers-on-runa/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>billjackbaugus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khpr.xeper.org/?p=25#comment-535</guid>
		<description>im relieved to have his work among us. thank you Edred.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im relieved to have his work among us. thank you Edred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

